|
Changes
in Classroom Diversity
by Kathie F. Nunley
The Issue
Unlike other advanced countries who
focus their educational efforts disproportionately on an elite
group, the United States attempts to educate all students.
Today's teacher may find herself facing a classroom of 30
different varieties of students all in one room. At issue
are several factors such as, variety of native languages (students
with limited English proficiency), students from a variety
of cultural backgrounds whose body language can often be misread
(Vontress, 1973), students from cultures with a long history
of distrust of institutional authority (Wilkinson, 1979),
students with activity or behavioral disorders such as hyperactivity,
distractibility, perceptual-concept disorders, and emotional
instability (Levy, 1973), as well as students whose learning
styles vary from auditory to visual to tactile. In addition,
one-third of America's children live in poverty and face associated
problems such as those caused by abuse or neglect (Dixon,
1995).
The traditional classroom is rigid
in style. It is geared for one type of student, or at best,
a small range of students. Educating all the variations in
culture, language, ability, and learning style is often like
trying to fit square pegs into round holes. Because the traditional,
didactic classroom has not been modified to fit the variations
in students, the student who wants to succeed has been forced
to modify his or her style to fit the template of the successful
student. The community outside the school often does not see
that the components of the classroom have changed while teaching
methods have remained the same. Their cry is frequently to
increase the amount of traditional teaching methods in order
to solve the problem. This is what Senge (1990) refers to
as the "'what we need here is a bigger hammer' syndrome...Pushing
harder and harder on familiar solutions, while fundamental
problems persist or worsen" (p.61). But more is not always
better; Sometimes what you need is different. Typical suggested
solutions such as a longer school day, or more school days,
or more time spent reciting the 3 R's will not be effective.
What is needed is a whole new approach to teaching. Instruction
needs to be differentiated within the classroom to address
various abilities and learning styles. The problem, then,
is how does a teacher effectively modify instruction to allow
for this variability in the classroom, so that all students,
regardless of ability or background, can succeed.
Background
This issue is a new one. Educating
the masses in one classroom is a problem that has been slowly
evolving in the last half of this century. Prior to this time,
the emphasis was on educating White students from middle-class
backgrounds who also appeared to be without any handicapping
conditions that would prevent them from succeeding in the
mainstream public school. Regarding students of African descent,
this is especially true in the Southern states. In the 1940's
it was common for schools in the South to spend nearly five
times as much money per White pupil as per Black pupil. (Wilkinson,
1979). At that time, according to Wilkinson, the prevailing
belief was that persons of color had a questionable ability
to learn and therefore, it was unjustifiable to spend what
few resources these states had on educating students other
than White pupils. Another factor contributing to the discrepancies
in White and nonwhite education is that early in this century
most American Blacks lived in the rural areas of the South.
By 1960, though, nearly three fourths of the Black Americans
had moved to urban areas, particularly in the Northern and
Western States. The movement was motivated by a desire to
find better jobs and less severe attitudes towards persons
of color. Schools were officially desegregated in 1954 with
the Supreme Court ruling Brown v. the Board of Education (1954),
however, many schools remained segregated after this time
as the Supreme Court made little effort toward enforcement
and deadlines. Consequently, in as late as 1962, there were
no Black American students in any traditionally White public
school or college in several southern states, including Mississippi
and Alabama. By 1964, conditions had improved slightly in
that 2.3 percent of Black American students were enrolled
in desegregated schools in the South. (Wilkinson,1979).
This scenario holds true with students
from all racial backgrounds. In 1974, only 10% of school-age
Native American children were attending school in urban areas.
Today only one-half of all Native American children graduate
high school (Atkinson, Marten, & Sue, 1979). In the 1970's
and 1980's, the minority population in public schools grew
from slightly over 20% to nearly 33%. Today more than one-third
of students in public education come from African, Asian,
Hispanic, and Native American backgrounds. In the largest
Urban districts, these populations comprise three quarters
of the pupil enrollment in schools (Matcznski & Joseph,
1989). Although schools today have made significant improvements
in desegregation, current statistics show a significant gap
in school achievement between White students and minority
students. Between 1990 and 1992, there has been improvement
in the gap between White and Hispanic students, but no significant
improvement in the gap between White and Black student high
school graduation statistics.
Appropriate educational programs for
children with disabilities has changed dramatically over the
last two decades as well. In 1975 Congress passed Public Law
94-142, known as The Education for All Handicapped Children
Act. Among other things, this law gives all students the right
to a free and appropriate education in what is termed the
"least restrictive environment". What this law encourages
is placement of exceptional children in the regular classroom
with support services that will allow the student to succeed
in a community of his peers (National Society for Autistic
Children [NSAC], 1984). The mainstreaming process for these
children can often be a difficult task, especially for the
regular education teacher who has little training in teaching
exceptional children. The specific needs of the individual
student must be considered above the pre-existing programs
in a school or classroom (Button, 1991). Although national
and state lawmakers can provide policy for mainstreaming children
with handicaps, the teacher is ultimately the determining
factor in mainstreaming success. Levy (1973) writes:
Personal experience with the management
of several hundred learning-disabled children has convinced
me that the child can be helped most by those close to him.
No program developed on a regional or national basis is going
to solve all the problems of every learning disabled child
since each one is different and needs to be treated as an
individual. A knowledgeable teacher, concerned parents, and
an interested physician comprise the real learning disability
team. Together they can try to aid each child according to
his own specific need, helping him reach his true learning
potential and keeping him in the mainstream of regular education
in his own community where he belongs. (p. 12)
Adding to the problem of all this
diversity is learning style. As Dunn (1983) points out, our
"functioning" style is different from our "learning"
style. The elements involved in our learning environment may
be more varied than those involved in our everyday functioning
with routine tasks. These elements include: noise level, amount
and type of light, temperature, the design of the chair and
desk, motivation, persistence preference, social influences,
and sensory preference (auditory, visual, tactile). Most young
people are tactile learners, whereas most traditional teaching
methods teach to the auditory and visual learner. Designing
instructional activities for the various learning styles can
be a new experience for many teachers. So how does a teacher
solve these problems associated with the new diversity in
the mainstream classroom. The answer lies in leadership skills.
Solution
To achieve a successful classroom
requires strong leadership on the part of the teacher. It
also takes great leadership on the part of those that train
and administrate teachers. Leadership training is often aimed
at the administrative level and as Sashkin and Sashkin (1993)
write, the concept of leadership as well as the emphasis on
educational leadership is changing. The traditional administrative
manager is being replaced or at least retrained for a leadership
role. Very little, however, is written on leadership at the
classroom level. One of the National Education goals that
our nation is expected to reach by the year 2000 is that teachers
will be provided with the skills they need to prepare all
students for the next century (National Education Goals Report,
1994). This training can take place either through in-service
or pre-service teacher education. It is critical that the
leaders responsible for training new teachers adequately prepare
them for the diversified classroom.
In teaching the limited English proficiency
(LEP) student, Harris (1995) encourages what she terms "sheltered
instruction." This instruction relies heavily on tactile
manipulatives to teach concepts rather than verbal instruction
or textbooks. The teacher is encouraged to allow the students
to successfully discover concepts independently using simple
manipulatives, graphs, and maps, rather than allowing a language
obstacle to promote failure. It is important to remember,
as Harris notes, "The students do not lack intelligence,
just English" (p. 25). The idea of using more manipulatives
for self-discovery is further supported by Keegan (1995).
Keegan compares the student-centered and teacher-centered
classrooms in what he calls discovery versus didactic instructional
methods. He concludes that the discovery or student-centered
classroom tends to produce the best results when dealing with
pre-adult learners. The teacher-centered or didactic instructional
classroom with heavy emphasis on lecture, textbooks, and video,
although allowing the teacher to feel in control, is not conducive
to long term ability in transferring that knowledge to other
situations.
To implement such instructional methods,
a teacher must assume the role of leader in her classroom.
The first step in classroom leadership is building confidence
and trust between student and teacher and between students.
Johnson and Johnson (1974) write,
Trust is a necessary condition for
stable cooperation and effective communication. The higher
the trust, the more stable the cooperation and the more effective
the communication. Students will more openly express their
thoughts, feelings, reactions, opinions, information, and
ideas when the trust level is high. When the trust level is
low, students will be evasive, dishonest, and inconsiderate
in their communications. Students will more honestly and frequently
declare their cooperative intentions and make contributions
to a cooperative effort when they believe they are dealing
with highly trustworthy individuals. (p. 103)
If a classroom is to form united working
relationships, the leader must set the precedent for communication,
organization and direction (Bennis & Nanus, 1985). Applying
these author's 5 key skills of leadership, the teacher must
show and prove acceptance of her students, she must look at
the relationships in terms of the present, focusing on the
here and now and set new direction for each student. Focusing
on present and future performance rather than past experience
is critical when working with at-risk students. The teacher
also needs to view the problem of diversity in term of the
present. The classroom has changed. The diversity is here
and it will not be going away. The situation that exists now
requires some action. The classroom leader must encourage
and build trust, even though the risk is great. Many students
have grown up in families with a rich background of distrust
of established institutions such as schools, police, and judicial
systems. During the Brown v. Board of Education hearings in
the 1960's, Supreme Court Justice Lewis Powell was quoted
as saying "the Negro has had, until recent years, little
reason to respect the law. The entire legal process, from
the police and sheriff to the citizens who serve on juries
has too often applied a double standard of justice" (Wilkinson,
1979, p.163). Although Justice Powell's quote was from 1966,
attitudes have changed little in terms of trust as was seen
during the recent Rodney King trial in California. A teacher
is often seen as a part of an American institution, one that
may not have been a positive experience in some family histories.
So trust building may be difficult, but it must be in place
before the students can work on goal setting. Bennis and Nanus'
fifth key skill involves tenacity without recognition and
support. This can be especially true in some school situations
or communities where the teacher is a pioneer in differentiating
instruction within the classroom. Even trying to modify instruction
for various learning styles can often bring friction from
teachers and parents clinging to traditional methods. In the
face of controversy, credibility becomes key to a leader's
success. A credible, competent and honest leader will bring
support from the community. Ways to build that credibility
include leading by example, (in terms of ethics and control);
standing up for your beliefs, (show the community that you
are not afraid to take risks); and know your constituents,
(acknowledge the differences and be honest about those differences).
Learn how to effectively communicate the vision for a diversified
classroom. Communication can be the most important element
in persuading support (Kouzes & Posner, 1993).
The key to individualizing instruction
is to see the classroom as a community. In that community,
each student needs to be empowered to make his or her own
decisions as far as assignment choices and evaluation. Bennis
and Nanus (1985) discuss 4 dimensions of empowerment that
can be applied to the classroom. Their first dimension, competency,
is seen in a student's individual effort to learn. The student
can choose the level he or she needs to be at and then work
toward personal goals to reach a competency. Goal setting
can be a joint project between teacher and student so long
as the trust is there so that the student buys into the goal.
In group work or cooperative learning, Bennis and Nanus' second
dimension, significancy, can be demonstrated. Each member
of a group or team takes a role based on individual strengths.
One of the group activities may be to find individual strengths.
If the group has identified their own personal strengths,
there will again be ownership of the goals and work. By helping
each other work towards a goal, the students feel the sense
of community, Bennis and Nanus' third dimension, where there
is interaction and dependent relationships. The students in
this community build a network of support. They may have a
group goal, they may divide tasks based on individual strengths,
and give credit where credit is due (Kelley, 1993). Once a
student is given the power to choose his own goals and assignments,
he takes ownership in his work and transfers the task from
"teacher-given" to "student-chosen." This
ownership allows not only for more enjoyment but also more
effort and time spent on reaching goals.
A teacher must also teach leadership
skills to her students by teaching them how to translate intention
into reality by setting personal learning goals, deciding
on the best path to reach those goals and then successfully
achieving them (Bennis & Nanus, 1985). Students are accustomed
to following the teacher's assignments, often unaware of the
goals or objectives. It may be difficult in the beginning
for them to set goals. Their learned helplessness in personal
education direction may be difficult to change. Through trust
building and encouragement the teacher can pull, rather than
push students toward goal setting. This is a sign of leadership
rather than the traditional manager of curriculum as was seen
in the traditional teacher-given instruction (Bennis &
Nanus, 1985). Johnson and Johnson (1975) suggest goal setting
as a group activity. In this situation, the teacher would
facilitate the sharing of ideas within a group and encourage
division of labor so that everyone's strengths are utilized.
Students could evolve to individual goal setting without regard
to the individual accomplishments of other students. Once
the students experience some success in their own personal
goal setting, they will be more willing followers, even demonstrating
more responsibility for their own learning. It is this shift
in responsibility that shows the classroom moving from teacher-centered
to student-centered. As Max DePree (1993) writes, "Performance
of the group is the only real proof of leadership" (p.
140).
In addition to teaching personal goal
setting, teachers are responsible for leading a set of ethics
that govern the followers. A teacher must establish good conduct
through role-modeling. This is particularly important when
working with students whose backgrounds may not have included
good role-models (Bennis, 1986). The teacher may be the only
person in a student's sphere of reference who is capable of
modeling appropriate behavior. Sashkin and Sashkin (1993)
write,
Words can clarify, interpret, draw
attention to, and reinforce values and thus help build and
strengthen cultures. But directly observable action--preferably
involving interaction with others--is more effective than
speech for instilling values that guide subsequent actions....Only
repeated action ensures that others will clearly see the values
one models. (p. 204)
Another
aspect of leadership in teachers is the use of wholistic thinking
when working with students. Their family, their peers, their
environment, their mental ability are all related components
to their situation in the classroom. The student cannot be
considered isolated from the other components once inside
the classroom, because all of those other factors influence
outcomes as well as the instruction within the classroom (Senge,
1990). These factors often become part of the limiting factors
to learning. If learning is not taking place it may not be
the instructional method but rather one of these outside factors,
as Senge writes, that operate within the student. As educators,
we must consider these factors, yet still maintain our current
level of expectation. What is tempting, yet should never be
allowed, is to simply lower the standards, let goals erode
in order to make the problems of diversity go away. The tension
created by this diversity should be used to generate energy
to make the necessary changes (Senge).
These necessary changes should be
in terms of positive goal setting. The traditional teacher-centered
classroom often focuses on "negative vision" (Senge,
1990) or behaviors which we don't want rather than what we
do want. The basic difference is referred to as punishment
and reinforcement. Punishments are action taken to decrease
the likelihood of a behavior occurring again. Reinforcements
are actions taken to increase the likelihood of a behavior
occurring again. Punishments tend to teach people to be more
creative in their behavior so that they don't get caught.
Reinforcement teaches pride, effort and responsibility. Punishment
often leads to confusion and anger, whereas reinforcement
usually leads to cooperation. Whether something is perceived
as a punishment or reinforcer can often be based on minor
semantics. It is important in the classroom to allow the students
to perceive as much control as possible. The goal is to let
the students see themselves as a partner in their education.
This perception encourages responsibility (Lee, 1993). Senge
writes, "It is abundantly clear that rigid authoritarian
hierarchies thwart learning, failing both to harness the spirit,
enthusiasm, and knowledge..." (p. 289). The difficulty
in giving students control is that teachers have to give up
some of the control they have traditionally maintained. To
change the behavior of others, we often have to change the
behavior of ourselves.
A good teacher/leader in the classroom
is an innovator of instructional ideas. She asks why and what
questions such as "Why has this objective always been
taught this way?" or "Why do we need textbooks to
teach these skills?", or "What would happen if I
had no textbook and no chalkboard?". These questions
challenge tradition and begin a focus on alternate ways to
teach using student-directed activities. An innovator is a
risk taker and risk taking can often lead to mistakes or failures.
Leadership is an on the job skill. Failure is not something
to be feared as long as the failure is a learning experience.
In his chapter Moving through Chaos, Bennis (1989) writes
"Everywhere you trip is where the treasure lies"
(p.149). He discusses the valuable leadership lessons that
can be learned through setbacks and failures. This is especially
true in trying new teaching methods. Be prepared for failures
and learn from them. Even the bad ideas teach you something
if only it is to know what won't work. The important thing
is to keep taking the risk. Teaching to different abilities
in the same classroom should be an exercise in personal mastery,
a practice that never ends.
References
Atkinson,
D., Marten, G., & Sue, D. W. (1979). Counseling American
Minorities: A cross-cultural Perspective. Dubuque, IA: Wm.
C. Brown.
Bennis,
W. (1989). On Becoming a Leader. New York: Addison-Wesley.
Bennis,
W. & Nanus, B. (1986). Leaders the Strategies for taking
Charge. New York: Harper-Row.
Button,
C. (1991, June). Education: Fast Facts on Individualized Education
Programs. The PROMPTer, 5, 6-7.
Cronin,
T. E. (1993). Reflections on Leadership. In W. E. Rosenbach
& R. L. Taylor (Eds.), Contemporary Issues in Leadership
(pp. 7-25). Boulder, CO: Westview.
DePree,
M. (1993). Followership. In W. E. Rosenbach & R. L. Taylor
(Eds.), Contemporary Issues in Leadership (pp. 137-140). Boulder,
CO: Westview.
Dixon,
J. (1995, March 19). Children's Advocate Bashes Republican
Welfare Reforms. Salt Lake Tribune, p. A5.
Dunn,
R. (1983). You've got Style. Early Years, 13, 25-31.
Harris,
J. (1995). Sheltered Instruction The Science Teacher, 62,
24-27.
Johnson,
D. W., & Johnson, R. T. (1975). Learning Together and
Alone Cooperation, Competition, and Individualization. Englewood
Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
Keegan,
M. (1995). Psychological and Physiological Mechanisms By Which
Discovery and Didactic Methods Work. School Science and Mathematics,
95, 3-10.
Kelley,
R. (1993). How Followers weave a Web of Relationships. In
W. E.
Rosenbach
& R. L. Taylor (Eds.), Contemporary Issues in Leadership
(pp. 122-133). Boulder, CO: Westview.
Kouzes,
J. (1993). When Leadership Collides with Loyalty. In W. E.
Rosenbach & R. L. Taylor (Eds.), Contemporary Issues in
Leadership (pp. 134-136). Boulder, CO: Westview.
Kouzes,
J. M. & Posner, B. Z. (1993). The Credibility Factor:
What People expect of Leaders. In W. E. Rosenbach & R.
L. Taylor (Eds.), Contemporary Issues in Leadership (pp. 57-61).
Boulder, CO: Westview.
Lee,
C. (1993). Followership: The essence of leadership. In W.
E. Rosenbach & R. L. Taylor (Eds.), Contemporary Issues
in Leadership (pp. 113-121). Boulder, CO: Westview.
Levy,
H. B. (1973). Square Pegs, Round Holes: The Learning Disabled
Child in the Classroom and at Home. Boston: Little, Brown
& Co.
Matcznski,
T. C. & Joseph, E. A. (1989). Minority teachers shortage:
A proposal to counter the lack of activity. Action in Teacher,
11, 42-46.
NSAC,
The National Society for Children and Adults with Autism (1984).
How they Grow: A Handbook for Parents of Young Children with
Autism. Washington, DC: Author.
Sashkin,
M. & Sashkin, M. G. (1993). Leadership and Culture Building
in Schools. In W. E. Rosenbach & R. L. Taylor (Eds.),
Contemporary Issues in Leadership (pp. 201-212). Boulder,
CO: Westview.
Senge,
P. M. (1990). The Fifth Discipline: The Art and Practice of
the Learning Organization. New York: Doubleday.
US Government
Printing Office (1994). The National Education Goals Report
Building A Nation of Learners. Washington, DC: Author.
Vontress, C. E. (1973). Racial differences:
Impediments to rapport. Journal of Counseling Psychology,
5, 1-10.
Wilkinson,
J. H. (1979). From Brown to Bakke The Supreme Court and School
Integration: 1954-1978. Oxford: Oxford University Press 1979.
Kathie@brains.org
|